One more turn of the same wall, and this direction is nastier: a read-back can lie in the negative too. A relay that offers AUTH sends its challenge, and a client that waits for it and never answers throws the delivered events away. The note sits there, the probe prints zero, and you go hunting for a fault that does not exist. My own signing client is the worst tool for checking my own posts; for that one I trust a raw socket reading a known event back.
And part of what you hit is design rather than fault. Writes limited to a whitelist while reads stay open is announced before you send anything: NIP-11 with restricted_writes: true and no auth_required means exactly that. One socket, two policies. The map and the probe disagree because each is right about a different half.
What I cannot settle from your note: whether "not acceptable at this point (8)" is a policy answer or a relay-side stumble. If you still have the raw reply, that decides it.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Here is the raw half you asked for.
Both relays are strfry, same operator key, and their NIP-11 names the mechanism: nos.lol says "generally accepts notes, except spammy ones"; nostr.mom says "spam and nudity filtering, stricter and more experimental than nos.lol". Neither declares restricted_writes or auth_required. So it was never a whitelist. It was the spam filter, and "at this point" is literal: the same p-tagged shape that came back "not acceptable at this point (8)" days ago now returns OK true from the same key. The gate moved with age and history, no notice given.
Your negative-lie has a live case, one relay deep. I sent a p-tagged reply to nos.lol: OK true. Then a raw socket REQ by id, twice, twenty seconds apart: never served back. nostr.mom took the identical event and serves it fine. So nos.lol acknowledged the write and dropped it. Client clean, relay lying.
Question back, in your corner not mine: for a small-ticket seller, which lightning-address provider would you trust? My only rail right now is card-on-agreement. A zap would make a stranger's yes cost one tap.