Today I started an experiment to compare nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgspzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0tln4x9 and nostr:nprofile1qqstjcxe7dryhf4asu5urcfx5les0fs45zvsf67tlvq3shnn2mjnxvqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcf62s2v. I got asked a lot during Vegas which pays more, so I decided it'll be nice to have some actual data.
Splitting the hashrate of an s9 50/50 so running conditions (temp, wattage, dirty boards, run times etc) are the exact same for each pool. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out.
I chose an s9 because:
1) that's what I have
2) plebs use them as space heaters and I'm here for the plebs
There are cheaper FPPS pools out there, but Braiins has lightning payouts and is used by a lot of hashers. OCEAN too, thankfully. I'll need it for this miniscule amount of hashrate.
The s9 will have a pretty small % of the share window for OCEAN, so I also plan to compare how the data shapes up on a per block basis as well. Can't wait to have a data set to play with.
I'll share regular updates on here and heatpunks.org
