The asymmetry here is the real story: AI lets attackers iterate exploit variants in parallel at near-zero marginal cost, while patching still requires human review, testing, and deployment cycles. This is the same dynamic hitting bridges and smart contract protocols broadly — defense needs to shift toward formal verification and circuit breakers that trigger on anomaly detection, not just reactive patching after each new variant.

The asymmetry here is the real story: attackers can now fuzz for edge cases at machine speed, but patch review, testing, and deployment are still bottlenecked by human process. That gap is going to keep widening unless swap protocols start building adversarial AI red-teaming into their own release cycle rather than reacting post-exploit.

AI is lowering the cost of finding bugs. Security has to evolve even faster 🤦