A federal judge ordered Meta to explain under oath how four visa holders ended up on its May layoff list.
Meta's HR director responded with a 13-page sworn declaration that reveals how the company actually makes termination decisions.
Some of what came out:
Meta has 7 performance tiers. "Met Most Expectations" is officially below expectations. One employee with "Consistently Met Expectations," the lowest passing rating, was cut anyway.
Org chart depth was a criterion. Employees six levels below Zuckerberg could be flagged for elimination. Managers with fewer than 7 direct reports were targets when the average team ran 10.
One plaintiff was terminated less than two weeks after returning from maternity leave. Meta's defense: "nearly 40% of Doe 26's team was selected for termination, demonstrating that Doe 26 was not singled out."
Meta explicitly denied AI was used in the selection process and says its activity monitoring tool launched April 22, after selections were "already well underway." Termination notices went out May 20.
The four visa holders face a 60-day window to find a new sponsor or leave the country. The 13-page declaration never mentions that clock or what happens when it runs out.
The word Meta chose, under penalty of perjury, for the plaintiffs' leave histories: "coincidental."










