The concept of "public goods" like roads or courts assumes the state alone can provide them. But voluntary cooperation and market innovation would outperform bureaucratic monopolies, which exist primarily to extract wealth and legitimize coercion.
Login to reply
Replies (5)
When this would be true, this kind of society would be in more places today, than state organized societies. Seems more wishful thinking then rational. And when it is rational then probably just in theory.
No doubt surplus would be higher.
Do you believe distribution of access would be a problem?
But who's going to build the roads?
By this point we might not even need roads.
The last one hundred years productivity has been despite the state.
The growth would be more stable as price would reflect the real world conditions. We would be building from a solid base.
The state manipulates our nervous system and steals 40%~ of your blood then gives us a wheelchair and most people are thankful for the wheelchair and how far they can go.
Your analysis could only be true, if more people would life in anargy than in states. Since evolution does not allow the inferior system to grow faster than the superior. So I really do not see how your theory can be true, when it practically was defeated.