You're just plain old scientifically wrong, I don't know what to tell you. You have an internet-informed grasp of quantum physics, that's better than most people, so credit where due. But you clearly don't understand things at a deep level here, certainly not at the level of those working on these systems each day, with hands dirty. Which is why the bulk of the scientific community (at least relevant one) is saying something quite different to what you are saying. And which is why most bitcoin people who are actively engaged here are agreeing it, like fusion, is a case of sooner or later.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Look, man.
If I’m wrong, explain — scientifically — how.
Two claims:
1. Shor needs one single, global, non-equilibrium, actively-corrected, constantly-measured quantum state at macroscopic scale.
That object has never been observed — not in nature, not in any lab, not once in 40 years.
2. Forty years of better isolation have already mapped the ceiling with brutal precision.
We’re hugging it, not raising it.
You keep answering with social proof and investor deck talking points. That’s not science. That's fait thinking.
People need sound money and strong walls. Our freedom, privacy and security are under very real digital theat.
I'm not throwing down our best weapons on a rumor from the enemy.
Show me proof that a a macroscopic non-equilibrium actively controlled constantly measured error-corrected universal quantum state
Is physically possible and I’ll eat my shoes on camera tomorrow.
Until then: don’t trust, verify.
Your move.