I'd say each to his own, but does money work if it can't be used as money? Can Bitcoin holds its' value if it doesn't ultimately become both SoV and Currency? I don't think so, you just can't have one without the other, or can you? One could use gold as an argument, but when gold was reduced to just SoV it also lost most of its monetary demand. The problem is, NGU need that monetary demand to keep Bitcoin healthy and strong.
StackSats.IO's avatar StackSats.IO
Saylor: “It doesn’t have to be a currency … Medium of Exchange is a distraction” Are you prepared to oppose Saylor? Because that is coming. He is not a Bitcoiner, he’s a BitcoinBug here for NGU only. He will happily accede to the State if he can keep his coins. View quoted note →
View quoted note →

Replies (2)

Agreed. Saylor is trying to buy time for himself (and us I believe) to stack sats, write code, and infect people with liberty. I hope it works because this police state will suck to leave to the next generation if we don’t steer the ship.
BTC_P2P's avatar
BTC_P2P 1 year ago
SoV is the use case the world needs and the one Bitcoin is engineered perfectly for. Bitcoin is always easily transferable at low volume but it doesn’t scale as a medium of exchange yet.