Replies (2)

Agree, but it does fix most problems.. Why conflict wouldn’t go to zero Even in a fair world, humans still have: Differing values. Competing visions of meaning. Identity and belief systems. Emotional responses: fear, pride, grief, love. These produce friction, not war. The key difference is this: Conflict without scarcity does not require violence. It becomes: Negotiation. Separation rather than domination. Voluntary association instead of forced unity. Think less war, more boundary-setting. The quiet truth: A world without war isn’t one without disagreement. It’s one without mechanisms that turn disagreement into mass violence. When systems stop feeding fear, scarcity, and domination; human nature doesn’t become perfect… but it becomes manageable, relational, and sane. (AI effectively helping articulate hope for a better future)