isnt the point making it more expensive already. making them go to the miners directly is already the point. and also filters dont effect fee estimations in a meaningful way. fee is not calculated based on what you have on your mempool that's not correct. even core is using more advanced methods to estimate fee. its just an argument. and also everyone's mempools is not supposed to be same already. filters are changes nodes can make without causing a network fork. we need more options for filters, allow people to write their own filtering scripts and rules. and when miners dont have similar filters to the rest of the network it takes longer for their blocks to propagate over the network, and if another miner finds another block in that time their block is ignored. which makes going against the network cost even more. decentralization doesn't mean everyone is copy of each-other. its normal for something decentralized to be messy slow, clunky and not butter smooth. that's the point. pure chaos of disagreement, but of course in the limits of consensus. and some of them talked about changing the consensus for this. but changing consensus for something dynamic wouldn't make sense. consensus is the untouched law, and constitution, and filters are the community. what filters nodes run collectively decides what is more expensive/harder to do in this network. which keeps unwanted stuff niche and not go mainstream, thats the point. not a great analogy but its like the "unwritten rules". funny thing is, they proposed this exact PR 2 years ago, it got rejected because people said, we can fix new taproot exploit by updating and adding filters. BUT funny part is that PR for the filters also got rejected because "its controversial". but suddenly this new PR is not? they knew this would happen, they rejected every filtering solution. so 2 years later they can propose it again. when the issue has gotten bigger. they are giving solutions to issues they caused. because their agenda from the beginning was allowing more data. they planned this. they say it on their other PR, i think it was something like "we can try again later when utxo set is bigger".