@ODELL @Luke Dashjr I saw Luke’s reference to “may” be legal and moral consequences for consensually storing illicit material. I think that’s referencing the fact that authorities could potentially attack node runners consenting to this, not Luke’s personal legal team. Correct? How is that a threat and not just making people aware that they could be stepping into a hornet’s nest?
Is there a threat I’m missing?
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Yeah, framing a legal opinion that you may or may not agree with as a 'threat' is just unproductive hyperbole that this controversy didn't really need more of.