I would politely disagree with calling this a prophecy and more of a project with nefarious intent. The difference comes in our perspectives based on your beliefs and my faith, though, strangely, I'm much more inclined to agree with much of the vague "spiritual" stuff than my modern evangelical Christian upbringing would suggest, as I think modern evangelical Christianity has been largely subverted by a stupid and stubborn materialism that was intentionally set about in the world to blind people to the spiritual reality of things. So, I'm my case, I look at what you wrote as more of the inevitable consequences of evil and not as a natural process. You're basically describing the hive mind state of the trabshumsnists. And that really bothers me.

Replies (3)

When you look at it from a wider perspective, you will realize very quickly, that you’re barely able to capture human nature & how completely different it may was 300 years ago or 300 years in the future. We can only observe each other today or use mathematical+philosophical systems. So you can’t say if this prophecy will be good for the people in the future or bad. But since they will - based on that - naturally replace us, it may be a very important transformation, or else it really would not be possible to keep human race alive. It basically makes our emotional processes more efficient and as beave and franny right here right now, we don’t get it because we see our way of feeling as the only right way. The fight between light and darkness may be forever keep going. It almost seems impossible to let one side win, only the end of the universe may stop this fight. The human race is forever transforming and I don’t see the need of a middleman between me & god. Can you give me more information about the hive mind transhumanits? Why does it bother you so much? I always thought that individualism is really important right now but I’m slowly viewing collectivism as the true and logical consequence.
I will need some time to answer your good questions in a sane and comprehensible manner. Much of what I want to say is still a bit too jumbled up in my head to be able to do that without having to think too much. I will, though. I think this kind of discussion is important. 😁
I see no difference in human nature 300 years or 2000 years ago, by the descriptions we have. Also i see no reason why such a difference will occur in 2027 specifically.