> The charge treats the alleged wipe as destruction of property intended to prevent a government seizure.
This does not seem like it fits the situation. The phone did not get destroyed. He just deleted data. Is data considered property? If yes, is not the burden of proof on them to show what he destroyed? But how can they prove it, if they do not know what was in there?
Login to reply
Replies (4)
This case reads a lot like they were already investigating him for sex crimes.
It's standard operating procedure to trap pedos by getting them to cross borders.
If data is property then people who isn't using GrapheneOS and other freedom tech are being stolen
> Unbeknown to him, federal authorities had put him on a terrorism watchlist because of his alleged association with the movement against Cop City.
> The government was investigating Mr. Tunick because of his associationwith an environmental movement known as Defend the Atlanta Forest, whichopposed the destruction of the South River Forest for the construction of an 85-acre, $115 million police training facility known as the Atlanta Public SafetyTraining Center. (Tunick_54). While the government depicts the Defend theAtlanta Forest movement as an “Anti-Government, Anti-Authority ViolentExtremist Group” (“AGAAVE”), it has not put forth evidence that Mr. Tunickwas involved in criminal activity in connection with the Defend the AtlantaForest movement. (Tunick_6, 54).
> Here, the CBP officers introduced themselves to Mr. Tunick and explainedthat they were “looking for people who are pedophiles.” [Timestamp 19:49:00].The officers never read Mr. Tunick his Miranda rights. The officers justified theirquestioning and demands to search Mr. Tunick’s phone by stating that they hadto confirm whether he possessed child porn. The officers never provided anydetails as to why they purportedly suspected Mr. Tunick was harboring suchcontraband. The government’s reports do not indicate any suspicion whatsoever
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28513064-tunicks-motion-to-suppress/
To me, it reads like they were going after an activist. Agents at the airport told him they want to see his phone just to check if he is not a pedo, while they knew it is about something else. It is a common tactic for cops to lie to trick you into giving or saying something. Like here, he maybe be tempted to say "omg, I am not a pedo. Take the phone and look for yourself!"

the Guardian
US government targets Cop City protester over phone operating system
Concern over US effort to prosecute Sam Tunick, accused by authorities of wiping his phone using GrapheneOS