BE's avatar
BE 6 months ago
Bad judgement by the organizers. A request to focus a presentation within certain parameters of the meeting plan and objectives would be reasonable for such an event, but an outright ban is a sign of both ignorance and insecurity. There are many things you’ve said or written that I don’t believe are accurate, but I fully support your presenting your ideas and conclusions to a free and open “marketplace of idea” to live or die on their merits and the capabilities of listeners or readers to do their own verification. The world/universe is big and complex. What living person knows it so well as to flawlessly distinguish among objective observations/measurements, hopes, dreams, fantasies, revelations, hallucinations, delusions, and adequate unbiased proof? Decentralized, open-source debate and collaboration is a good place to start.

Replies (3)

Diyana's avatar
Diyana 6 months ago
I think this is a good response I can stand with I'm response to you. I am not familiar with all that he has shared out there or had a chance much to tune into his podcast. I've noticed he's unraveling and discovering a lot that I've come to know the last couple of decades that need more voice and he is using his. I've also seen some stuff I rather not touch and could classify a bit too far out... But only time could tell cland reveal certain things so I keep an open mind.