This is the best speech from Jack Mallers!
I was anti him, now i am with him. (Personally, not money printing, bussines Jack)
Login to reply
Replies (7)
If you like the speech you might want to give the source material a read: wtfhappenedin1971 dot com and this article: 

dergigi.com
Inalienable Property Rights - The Law, Language, Money, and Morality of Bitcoin | dergigi.com
If speech and the free exercise thereof is sacred, then Bitcoin is sacred, because all that Bitcoin requires of you is to think and to speak.
π₯π₯
The title brings back memories of my bachelor's degree. I chose "fundamental" instead of "inalienable". After I found bitcoin, I wanted to burn my work because there's hardly any property right without bitcoin. Maybe that piece of cringe was my price to pay to enter bitcoin. π€
Thanks a lot!
1971 got a great update Form Blocktrainer team π
Your articles are fascinating i read Them More than once and listened to them at the bitcoin Bibliothek or other audio streams/posdcasts you and #Einundzwanzig made me also become a content creator. WEhen will you be on the Podcast again?

Blocktrainer - Bitcoin Bildung & News
WTF HAPPENED IN 1971? Die katastrophalen Auswirkungen von ungedecktem Papiergeld
Eine Sammlung von Quellen und Grafiken, die zeigen, dass sich viele Dinge im Weltgeschehen seit der Aufhebung des Goldstandards im Jahr 1971 versch...
@Guy Swann did you do this one? Canβt find itβ¦
Did Jesus own his robe?
Unalienable is the word I choose because it's the word the founding fathers chose.
Unalieanable rights are rights that cannot be taken away, not even by a 100% majority vote. Unalienable rights cannot be legislated away, and they cannot be ruled away by a supreme court. They cannot be contracted away. Governments and institutions cannot add qualifiers to unalienable rights, and they cannot dilute them. They have no authority over unalienable rights.
America is a country of unalienable rights. The Constitution does not grant those rights. The Constitution explicitly tells the government that it cannot, and shall not, infringe on those rights.
Democracy robs freedom of choice from minorities.
Unalienable rights and individual free agency guarantee the rights of minorities and of individuals.