There is an enduring tension between the centralising and decentralising forces in human complex systems and for good reason. Any move in one direction will bring about an increase in energy in the opposite direction. The system is never in equilibrium but always in tension.
Therefore, should we worry about respecting Chesterton's fence? In my view, we should first and foremost only concern ourselves with it in an individual or local sense.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
No human systems are in equilibrium.
The balance you point to is a very good point. I think it's secured by economics. Centralization is closely tied to coercion and control, and so every tightening of the screw increases the value of, and the "market" for freedom. It's like how prohibition handed a lucurative business to the Corleone family. Centralization is the fuel of the bitcoin community (and other forces of opposition.
That was also @npub1gdu7...6nak point in the bitcoin standard: The worst thing governments can do to bitcoin, is to start acting responsibly.
I'm thinking of writing something on how economic (and financial) principles apply to ideas, culture and personal choices. It's an interesting (and big!) topic.