There is a palpable difference between downtime that results from your own activities (or incompetence), and downtime that you have zero control over as you wait, sitting on your hands, for your provider to return. It might mostly be an emotional pang, but it's one that inspires a resiliency and self-sufficiency mindset which can be harvested positively. Mild tangent: we can also self-host hardware and connect p2p, especially if NAT traversal and hole-punching keeps advancing. Then the only thing out of your hands is ISP. ....and for that there are always mesh networks.... We just don't have to accept this state of affairs or rationalize it.

Replies (1)

Specifically on your side tangent: > especially if NAT traversal and hole-punching keeps advancing I'm wholly against this as it's been implemented now. Only because networks, as they have been designed, rely on very high levels of trust at the moment. Anything that is designed to traverse obscurity and hard protections is inherently breaking that trust barrier. It's an automatic assumption systems behind my firewalls can safely speak to each-other. It's as trusted network, we can drop the firewalls, the added encryption, honeypots, and paranoid routing gymnastics because we trust that, once configured my services are "safe" behind the walls.