No apology necessary. Really. I am always open to learning and, again, I know I'm not an expert or anything like that. But, I am studying earnestly and do not wish to lead anyone astray. I take the admonition that teachers (which I do not consider myself...) Very, very seriously. If nothing else, take this as an opportunity to reading scripture with fresh eyes. ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿซ‚

Replies (1)

Hmm. Older translations say "thieves", not "robbers", and both have the same negative connotation. A robber is a subset of thief, focused on stealing from particular places and who uses aggression to get your goods, such as bank robbers and highway robbers. And as opposed to a "burglar" who is a stealthy thief who breaks into buildings. It is rather consequently described, in all retellings of the scene. [[book:: Bible | Matthew 21:12-17, Mark 11:15-19, Luke 19:45-48, John 2:13-16 | KJV]] You say that He thought _what_ they were doing was fine, but that He was only angry about _where_ they were doing it, but they were actually notoriously shady characters, at the time, and their transactions were partly illegal and completely usurious.
โ†‘