If she asks a bunch of questions, and has filed a bunch of stuff, and they always say "we don't know what these things mean", what's her recourse? does she have to take those "confusing" things to a higher court, and are they compelled to hear it, or can they just tell her to get lost?
"you can only plead X or Y (not Z)". how is this different than "you can only plead X" (like, say, "guilty")? what's the difference between not accepting her "equity" plea and not accepting someone else's "not guilty" plea?
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Because there is no such thing as pleading “equity” she might as well be pleading Banana which would warrant the same result.
As for all the stuff she filed she is fully within her right to appeal any order striking or denying those things.
That’s sort of the point here, if any of this stuff was right or good it would be appealed and would succeed.
The reality is these people think there is a secret book of rules being concealed from the public and if you but invoke the secret rules they are bound to follow them. The reality is there is no “Secret Menu” you can order from if you just know the magic words.