Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

This reeks of desperation. Do you really not understand why it's good to fix exploits and loopholes that attract spammers? Or why its important for node runners to run code that aligns with their values? You will find yourself outnumbered. It is so odd seeing you try to find a way right down the middle of this debate. So many core supporters told the rest of us to fork off. Now it seems like some of the people on the core side are regretting saying that. Why are you so nervous? Are people allowed to fork off or should we just do what you and your friends say?

↑ Parent

Replies (4)

ODELL odell@primal.net 3 weeks ago

a hard fork would be a very clean safe way to handle this but bip110 is not that the goal is to reorg thousands of transactions if yall dont get your way and your dear leader is calling anyone with concerns a pedo so spare me the lecture on desperation

CitizenPedro citizenpedro@nostrcheck.me 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I really don't see it like that. I think the decision of completely disallowing users to choose if they want or not to cap the OP_RETURN was not a good move by Core and Knots is better for allowing choice but: This, on the other hand, is something else. The risk argument is weak here. If and ONLY if there's a move by governments because of anything that is on the Bitcoin chain, THEN we should move there. Not now. This is a weak move otherwise. Bitcoin doesn't need this right now.

ihsotas 3 weeks ago

A hard fork would be forking off. This fake emergency bullshit smells so hard of fed it glows.

HODL Baek 3 weeks ago

The whole thing is too political now. Imma just stack sats. Another 5% discount today