For newly received Ark BTC, the user also faces the risk that the previous owner and the Ark service provider could collude to double spend it, which is similar to Spark BTC. The user can refresh the received Ark BTC to eliminate this counterparty risk, which Spark cannot do.
After refreshing, the counterparty risk for the Ark BTC is: *“if the user stays offline for too long (approximately one month) and their VTXO expires, the service provider may be able to take control of it.”*
The counterparty risk for Custodial wallet and Cashu users is that the server operator might run away with the funds.
Liquid users face the risk that multiple federation members might collude to steal the funds.
Spark users face the risk that the service providers might collude with the previous sender to double-spend the received funds.
The counterparty risk for Ark is that if the user stays offline for too long and their VTXO expires, the service provider may be able to take control of it.
The counterparty risk for Lightning channel users is that if the channel counterparty broadcasts an old state (a settlement transaction favorable to them) on-chain, and the user fails to come online and publish the latest state within the dispute period to contest it.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →