Some clarifications to this point made on a related thread:
fiatjaf's avatar fiatjaf
Well, that was poorly phrased, what I actually meant was: not all the people have to talk about Bitcoin all the time. Some people of course will, and that is fine and good, it's just not great that we _only_ have those people on Nostr currently. This is of course a hyperbole, we don't just have these people, but we have a lot of them, and that is one of the factors that make some people (who may even like Bitcoin, I know some) not want to use Nostr. I'm not saying people reading this message should stop talking about Bitcoin, that's not what I'm saying, please. In fact I'm not saying you (the generic reader of this note) should do anything. All I'm doing is raising a point and hoping there may be some solutions (probably related to using relays to organize content, loosely-defined communities and niches of interest like I mentioned on my other note from yesterday and also tangent to @npub10000...vwqk's idea) that we (by we I mean actually anyone reading this message that may have the urge to do anything) should look into implementing. Thank you for understanding.
View quoted note →

Replies (1)

Do we expect here a suddent change from one day to another to have everthing on nostr? Do we measure the number of people who are not talking about Bitcoin day by day? Do we know how non-bitcoin related things evolve on nostr?
โ†‘