but how is anyone without a phd supposed to understand all this? you don't want to be giving just two options: (1) accept the centralising defaults or (2) make a random choice as a result of being forced to make a choice but having no idea what that choice is about.
You need a third option, which is forced but very easy to understand choices (so informed choices), or a fourth option, which is non-centralising defaults.
Right now everything seems like (1) or (2).
Login to reply
Replies (1)
non-centralizing defaults come with outbox to begin with. however the user discovered nostr already gives a point of entry into the ecosystem, that could be following someone or connecting to a relay.
and for obvious reasons, your third option is objectively the best, users need to have a basic idea of what goes on behind the UI so that they can make conscious choices.
i agree with you that it gets really confusing, and thus the reason why this space needs more UX designers which are good at dealing with decentralized tools.