It shouldn't be considered libertarian or anarchism to just want the government to be less bloated and more fiscally responsible. Maybe just as a start we stop sending trillions to fund overseas wars and try to not grow the debt. Many countries don't fund other people's wars, this isn't libertarian utopian philosophy.

Replies (7)

EchDel's avatar
EchDel 1 year ago
No, but you would be labled an extremist either way.
They don’t send trillions to fund wars. They announce things. To gaslight you. It’s all paper games & psyops in these here parts. Focus within. Stack your sats. Buy a coffee/muffin from the small shop in your town & not a chain. Stay local. Fuck Global. Then you win. πŸ†
Default avatar
Truman 1 year ago
Stop using fiat currencies and you will be fine whatever They do. USG debt is in usd, and you know they can print usd and pay every debt. But their game is to take debt, and never pay it. Buy bitcoin and everything will be fine. Hold usd and only violence will survive.
banjo's avatar
banjo 1 year ago
ABSOLUTELY correct! Each of us has to work within a budget (or we go bankrupt). The government should be subject to the same rules. (AND the corollary should be that their ability to tax must be constrained--politicians must not be allowed to unilaterally increase taxes whenever they feel they need more "revenue")
↑