Yes, but i'm mostly looking for your writings on Drivechains, not adopting your whole worldview, which is probably already aligned with mine if you're a Tuttle fan.
I have actually audited gcc because i am actually that autistic and sexless. I was hyper focused on a lisp transpiler at the time so it was part of that deep dive.
My point is, you quoted all of your written work in a comment opposed to drivechains. You mention a common objection that has been "debunked" from day two of bip300. Almost a decade ago, which means you not know what you are talking about. So, i could read 30 articles and use all that time to find the one relevant objection i'm interested in, or you could just point it out.
My goal here is find something wrong with drivechains, i'm a bug hunter, so sonething you say might be valid. But all the arguments so far against it have been really really bad. It's an interesting and worthwhile economic and technical project.
