If you thought that you wouldn't advocate things that turn the entire base network into a centralized intermediary.
Real problem solving does take time. "Make 'em bigger" doesn't actually solve anything.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
As I am not a maxi I advocate for small blocks on BTC and for big blocks everywhere else.
Your point of view is just so dense because you see everything through the one coin to rile them all.
Once you widen your perspective you'll see that BTC is perfect as it is. And the world is corresponding to Bitcoin. And bigger dynamic blocks on Monero or bcash are perfectly fine as well. They actually don't need to have small blocks, as BTC has that covered already.
The market always creates choices for traders. And currency competition (not monopoly) is the goal if you follow the Austrian school of thought.
Money tends toward one because it is a language & an economic protocol. Saying we need monetary competition is kinda like saying we need competition for rules of the road. We need competition to decide if driving on the right or left is better, we need competition to decide if red should mean stop or go. Consensus around the rules of the road are what allow people to get where they need to go. Money is what enables value comparison & competition. If we had endless competition about internet protocols then nothing would work. The monetary competition is going to eventually come to an end & I think Bitcoin is going to win it because development took network security & robustness more seriously.