Its a bit weird though, shitting on Nostr.
I get it if you are already tied to another protocol like atproto or activitypub; protocols compete after all.
But i will just assume that is not the case with Dan.
Could also be you don't care about freedom tech at all, or don't understand the issue, but that would be a bit weird for someone in Bitcoin (but could still be possible).
So what is his deal? If its ''its not going to go anywhere", then i wonder at what point he came into Bitcoin, because if we roughly align Bitcoin's jan 2009 to Nostr's jan 2021, Nostr is currently halfway 2014. Bitcoin's price on 03-07-2014 was 666$, off from the 1k peak in december the year before.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Freedom tech mirrors our ancestral desire for autonomy, just like our diet.
Dan's allegiance lies with his donors, not freedom tech, likely Klaus Schwab's WEF agenda.
Freedom tech like Nostr is essential to individual sovereignty, as Epictetus said, "no man is free who is not master of himself"