A little meta feedback here. I think a better direction than to directly copy ChatGPT’s output is to use ChatGPT as a resource to interrogate/sharpen/refine why you disagree with lasers post and then to put it into your own words. Because you might have a very interesting or unique perspective, but I can tell it’s A.I. by the formatting and that makes me immediately reject it. Whereas originally I came into the post curious to hear a conflict between you and @Laser not between laser and ChatGPT. Just my opinion.