the catholics did not disagree with gallileo because they thought the earth was flat. they just thought that the earth was the center of the universe.
it's a specious argument because although the sun is bigger than the earth, is it necessarily so that "earth is orbiting the sun" or is there a bidirectional relationship?
further, the whole notion of a "center of the universe" is also quite specious because we have never seen the edge (is this sounding familiar) and so how do we know that space itself isn't a 4d hypersphere like the surface of the earth is a 2d surface on a sphere.
because if it is, then there is no center to the universe the same way as there is no centre to the surface of the earth. it's unbounded. you can't have a center without edges.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
in this respect, both gallileo/copernicus and the catholic church were both right
but even still today mainstream science insists on the big bang theory and the dark energy shit. when it should be obvious that as above so below, 2d surface without boundary on earth, 3d voluem without boundary of universe. this also means there is a horizon to the universe and we are still far away from seeing it. just check out the differences between Webb's deep field view and Hubble. still moar. and wen horizon of the curved space?
the universe is WAY BIGGER than anyone thinks, if you ask me. and getting bigger at a rate of doubling every orbit electrons, or maybe faster.
Big Bang theory takes God out the picture so the peasants will worship the state instead.