Why didn’t he chose the classical ICO way with a fresh new coin ? And also how such a MASF wouldn’t be purely a 51% attack risking to harm bitfoin more than solving any problem we may supposedly have ?

Replies (1)

In which world a "classical ICO" would be a better idea? Why would you even consider that? In which sense a MASF is equivalent to a 51% attack? A 51% attack is when a coalition of evil miners decide to revert transactions in order to steal things, a MASF is just activating an optional soft-fork.