To separate money and state does not mean to never have politicians involved in any capacity.
You could have all the presidents of the world at that conference and Bitcoin is still the separation of money and state.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Objection.
Policymakers create rules infringing on the individual's free use of capital. Its not about controlling the asset, rather, the subjects they have dominion over.
Case in point: cap gains tax on bitcoin transactions.
Sure, bitcoin—a thing—doesn't care, but the person who wanted to use but not be taxed for doing so, does.
Classic coercion.
Rules that infringe on individuals free use of capital have nothing to do with separating money and state.
When people say this they mean removing the state from monetary policy.
🤘