Yeah, that's why I use implementations that don't pass along your smut. Also, why does it even matter Citrea uses fake keys for your Rollup Vitalik wannabe bullshit, OP_RETURN doesn't even affect your bottom line. (Unless you are a fed that is)

Bitcoin doesn't care about your feelings, too. Or your conflicts of interest with citrea.

It is a threat though and it’s odd that you wouldn’t know it. Having your data directly visible vs fragmented is flying it close to the sun legally speaking. You could argue you didn’t know about it - but all that it takes to negate this is someone tweeting then going CP in an op return. At least fragmenting gives you some plausible deniability regarding the “knowing” aspect.

You're coping with ridiculous pretzel logic. Your node will still download and share said smut after it arrives in a block. Even if you run Knots.

Then I and others will expose the Miner responsible for distributing CSAM. Irreparable reputational damage. You are the pretzel here, filters don't work, that's why you have to disable them on the policy level... Yeah, real sound logic there.

Go for it. Bitcoin as a system doesn't give a shit about reputation, it pays whoever mints a valid block.

Again, disingenuous. Bitcoin doesn't care about any of our feelings, but you just said you care about lawyers feelings.

Damn, that Ivory tower really detatches people from reality. People are still made of flesh. A reputation of what you're describing, you would be far more paranoid than you already are. Bitcoin is only money not a force-field.

No, a lawyer is essentially an engineer of the code that comprises the State. I'm interested in actual State based attack vectors upon Bitcoiners. I don't care about lawyers feelings, I care about how legal code could be executed.