Thread

> You can't enforce 'spam is illegitimate' I am happy to discuss the effectiveness of spam limits in another thread. In this thread, my aim is to get consensus on this proposition: it's okay to block other people's transactions based on moral objections Got a problem with that? Then you'll have to get rid of the 21 million cap, doublespend prevention, and proof of work. Because those all exist to block other people's transactions based on moral objections.

We don't need to rehash the "what is SPAM" esoterica. We can say non-monetary data has no place here. Which is what BIP444 does. The Bitcoin network will turn into Ethereum if we continue down the current path. If that's what you actually want, just use Ethereum. Otherwise, fork off.

That's an odd use of 'moral objection' Having moral objections to spam Tx's and therefore changing consensus to remove some certain types then why not do this for Txs that are of very bad monetary nature?

Before I met Susan, my trading journey was full of confusion, losses, and frustration. I didn’t understand the market, I had no proper strategy, and I lacked the confidence to make the right decisions. But with Susan’s knowledge, patience, and guidance, everything changed. She didn’t just show me how to trade—she taught me how to understand the market, control my emotions, and grow with discipline. Today, I am the trader I am because of Susan. Her skills and mentorship shaped my success and completely transformed my financial path. Susan is a highly skilled trader recognized for her outstanding performance in cryptocurrency, forex, and digital asset markets. With years of experience, she has developed deep knowledge of technical and fundamental analysis, allowing her to identify profitable opportunities and manage risk with precision. As a teacher, Susan is dedicated to educating new and growing traders. She focuses on real skills: understanding market psychology, building consistent strategies, and mastering risk management. She doesn’t just give signals—she teaches traders how to become independent, confident, and successful in the market. Her professionalism, transparency, and patience set her apart. Susan believes that true trading success comes from discipline, knowledge, and a long-term mindset—not luck. Her mission is to help others build sustainable wealth and financial freedom through responsible trading. 📩 Contact Susan Zangi: 5091878735 Line: https://line.me/ti/p/8dmqYJw8mb Gmail: mgement907@gmail.com

No it doesn't, stamps are still allowed last time I checked (it's been a while). BIP444 does not stop non-monetary data either way.. Bitcoin is fuck you money So fuck you :) But I do think getting angry at people using Bitcoin a way you don't like will stop them

I think it is okay to do this for Txs that are of a bad monetary nature For example, if someone creates coins outside of the mining protocol, I think it is okay to burn the newly created coins and block such a tx from happening again I also think that if someone creates a spam tx, it is okay to make their outputs unspendable and bloc such a tx from happening again But that's what I think. What do *you* think?