If you can't afford on-chain, you can use custodial lightning, preferably ecash, until you improve your economic position and the security of self custody is worthwhile your increased savings.
Eventually on-chain wouldn't even have capacity to on-board people to lightning, but I'd fancy some upgrades to lightning's protocol allowing channels to be opened natively on lightning or to Bitcoin itself, like covenants.
If you don't have savings to lose, Wallet of Satoshi works just fine.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Lightning is fine for small transactions, I wouldn't keep any sizeable amounts on there though. The risk of having issues or losing your money is significantly higher than onchain, which is why I am skeptical of recommending this as an alternative.
I don't consolidate on chain any more. When I run out of inbound liquidity on lightning I send it out. That's about as big as my self-custodial lightning balance is.
Personally bullish on lightning. CLN is very reliable.