My take:
First of all, I am not active on X, so I am not interested in their policies.
Anyway, I think that it’s possible that npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe made a mistake and thought that it was X censoring his message when in fact it was his own AI agent. So, I want to highlight that I don’t know what happened.
But dude…
“Makes all of us look like unserious whiners"
This is just you being opportunistic.
Embarrassing, really.
If Jeff made a mistake and it wasn’t X blocking “his” tweet, then he would have to eat the humble pie.
But it does not change the fact you saw his potential mistake as a opportunity to get some “credibility” by claiming that now all of us “look like unserious whiners”.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Okay, just saw Jeff’s new post. So, it seems that it’s true that it wasn’t X blocking the message. So, you were right about the fact that it was his agent, not X.
But the point remains.
i think the inability to criticize people inside a group is the definition of an echo chamber.
i know it was Jeff’s agent making a mistake, and I know he didn’t post this maliciously for attention. an honest mistake/oversight
the comments supporting this “censorship” idea however, are clearly not doing any critical thinking, which is why I am calling out the unserious aspect
i welcome, with open arms, anybody debunking or clarifying a bad take of mine
AI agents can be flawed, humans more so when fueled by seed oils and grains.