You have really taken in all bad core's propaganda without any logical thought. "My point about this is the peasants are being upset about something that really doesn't affect Bitcoin in any notable way." - Bitcoiners are Plebs, not peasants. Blowing up OP_RETURN affects Bitcoin in a destructive way. "Core is Peer Reviewed, from a technical standpoint core has less implementation flaws, and is the safer software to run." - Bitcoin Knots is Core + filters, also at least 10 Bitcoin developers contribute to it. Core is not safer. "Just because something isn't visible to you doesn't mean it isn't happening." - Doesn't the same apply to you too? "Using Fee Markets are a better disincentive than filters are." - Using BOTH filters AND fee market is even BETTER. "Now to clarify, I think Luke Dash jr. is a smart guy, and means well, and I'm sure most of the Knots people mean well too but they're conflating non-issues into issues." - You are not the one who tells who is "conflating" what and you are actually wrong again. "But Bitcoin Core is bought out by Big Bitcoin also, primarily Blockstream." - Not sure what you mean here. Any sources or evidence? "Knots won't fix Bitcoin because Bitcoins problems are bigger than someone tying a picture to a UTXO which could be interpreted many different ways by different software wallets." - We first fix the major risk and then we address lesser risks. Also you don't state any of these "bigger problems"? "Financial transactions require additional data in some cases, and removing or limiting OP_Return could limit the financial transaction that could be done on Bitcoin." - Bitcoin Knots defaults to 42 Bytes OP_RETURN. I run it with the defaults. Also in what exact way "could limit the financial transaction"? "If you want a Cryptocurrency that limited its additional transaction data, and focuses only on Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash Systems while maintaining privacy monero works better." - Go fuck yourself, retarded shitcoiner. "Knots is incompatible with privacy preserving tools like RoninDojo" - What is "RoninDojo" and why it is significant to Bitcoin Freedom Money? "The Knots people need to stop being disingenuous about the issue, and saying core supporters supporters support CSAM." - "After Bitcoin SV (BSV) Node developers and miners lifted the OP_Return data size limits to 100KB, activity immediately took off as users started posting texts, videos and even pictures. Unfortunately, among these posts was apparently (not yet confirmed) a piece of illegal content involving alleged child exploitation material, The Next Web reported." "I don't think Luke Dash Jr. is a Federal Agent but I think both sides have a financial stake in the updates, which is why so much FUD about "The Other Bitcoin" is being deployed." - Is that some kind of retarded propaganda including key words like "The Other Bitcoin", "Federal Agent", "FUD"? "At least with a hard fork then the debate about this will end completely since both projects can focus on making their "Bitcoin" the way they want it instead of complaining about Bitcoiners who aren't following their node of choice." - No one wants hard fork, you fucking retard. Bitcoiners are freedom maximalists who defend their principles and Bitcoin being Freedom Sovereign Money. Its obvious you want to provocate "hard fork". "Bitcoin is permissionless, I don't care what node you run, run v29, v30, knots, knobs, or Bitcoin Cash if you want but don't make the debate about people who disagree with you are evil." - People who try to exploit Bitcoin, who try to manipulate others and are dishonest are evil. Some are just brainwashed retards, like you maybe. "Because core people aren't evil because if they were then they would be working for fiat systems instead of curating a Permissionless Cash system." - Corruption is a bitch. Corruption unleashes the worst from people. But you have your own opinion and thats fine. "If people wanted to use Bitcoin for csam they would find other ways to do it but anyone with a brain would know that a proper mechanism would be built to prevent this, or that people would accept it as a nature of Bitcoin's permissionless behavior." "Like I said Fee Markets are the best determination, make Data transactions more expensive than Monetary transactions, and this problem prices itself out of the market, eventually even state actors wouldn't be able to maintain a sustained attack." - You didn't say anything logical. Filters work together with fee markets.