Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 3
Generated: 03:34:30
yeah, I’m convinced this would be effective against spam. nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq0raz2nv9acla89z2fepdaff5ymmkrewkqvtrresqqun8w2nyqf7qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejz7qpqrvthzfvjgqgguya2s8e6v4szxyc3k5jad93hnccnlywuwpu9qh0sfrwjnu
2025-09-08 04:06:09 from 1 relay(s) 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (3)

If people were willing to wait an hour or more to create an account, or go to a real computer and wait 15 minutes, then maybe. The problem is that spammers with high end hardware will create accounts a lot faster than most users will. And whatever rate spammers are able to achieve, it has to be slower than the average cost of detecting and deleting a spam message. Web-of-trust seems to work very well. So PoW doesn't have much of a place anymore. Especially on 'every message'. I suggested a few days ago doing it on the pubkeys themselves, so you only have to wait once, and do it at the end (like you say), but I sorta got talked out of it because of this computational-power asymmetry.
2025-09-08 09:51:23 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
I don’t think this is a matter of comparison with ordinary users. The absolute number of spam messages should decrease as a result. In the current state, muting is essentially meaningless against spammers. I agree that WoT works well, but as you know, it’s a gated community.
2025-09-08 10:47:42 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply