If you’re not yet convinced that the #TrumpAssassination was a “kayfabe-style” staged event, then, you need to incorporate the fact described below to your interpretation of the event and still have it makes sense. Look at #Trump’s right hand position in the three attached images. The first image is famous Doug Mills photo of a bullet passing by Trump. The second image is a screenshot taken at the time where the first supersonic shockwave can be heard on the video. The third image is a screenshot taken at the time where the second supersonic shockwave can be heard on the video. A supersonic shockwave heard from Trump’s microphone indicates the moment at which a bullet passes by Trump’s microphone. Hence, the second image is the moment at which the first bullet passes by Trump’s microphone and respectively the third image is the audio signature for the second bullet. Now, based on Trump’s right hand position, can you tell me which bullet Doug Mills photo has captured? The first or the second? It can’t be the third or following bullets as Trump has already ducked under the stand by then. Yes, you’re correct it can be neither of them as the first image depicts Trump’s right hand mid-air while the second image has it on the stand and the third on his ear. You can verify for yourself that I took the screenshots of the video at the correct time by slowing down the video and pausing at the sound of the supersonic shockwaves: This means that one of the following is true: - Doug Mills photo was tampered with and a bullet was added to it. - The sound of the supersonic shockwaves was simulated to Trump’s microphone. - Both of the hypothesis above are true. What we know for sure is that Doug Mills photo and the supersonic shockwaves signature can’t be both authentic. Considering this irrefutable fact, do you still believe that Trump assassination was a real failed attempt or that it was a #StagedAssassination? After being confronted with this evidence those who still ignore it from their interpretation of the event are either in strong denial or disinfo agents. This is the smoking gun similar to how WTC7 is the canary in the coal mine of the 9/11 narrative. If you try making sense of the event while ignoring this key fact, your interpretation can’t be taken seriously. #PsyOp #FalseFlag #EarGate

Replies (20)

Here is a calculation demonstrating the delay cannot be explained without the falsification of either the supersonic shockwaves, photo or both. View quoted note →
Staged doesn’t mean faked. I’m not saying that people didn’t get killed that day. Nobody had been able to explain the inconsistency between the supersonic shockwave sound and the photo of the bullet. The only explanation I can see is that one of the two if not the two have been tampered with hence, it’s likely that it was staged. If you have an alternative explanation please share.
It’s the famous photo of the bullet that allegedly was shot at #Trump. It’s not me who say it’s a bullet but the photographer. If that’s not supposed to be a bullet, then someone has to come with an alternative explanation that is more credible. Good luck with that. My exact point is to say that we have proof that this photo was tampered with hence, the trace of the bullet was added to the photo.
S!ayer's avatar
S!ayer 9 months ago
Agreed. Not only with the photographer capturing the bullet (lol) but the whole thing seemed a perfect photo op. However someone was shooting as people did die, whether they were sniped or just bystanders, that would mean that the conspiracy also included civilian casualties as part of the "full effect" It's possible. What's one or two civilians vs winning the election? Worth their lives?
LogicallyMinded's avatar
LogicallyMinded 9 months ago
They’ve killed more than two innocents in previous false flag. Evil but not shocking.
Default avatar
kpr797 9 months ago
Hmm. I don't see a bullet in any of the photos. And why would there be one anyway? Bullets are much too fast to be captured by typical photography, right?
LogicallyMinded's avatar
LogicallyMinded 9 months ago
You can see a trace behind Trump in the first photo. It’s the photo that was published in the New York Time by Doug Mills (photographer who took the photo of Bush in the classroom on 9/11). He explained that he had his camera shutter speed was set on 1/8,000th of a second which for a political rally is an odd setting to have by default.
Default avatar
kpr797 9 months ago
I can't speak to the authenticity of the photo, but, for what it's worth, ChatGPT says it should technically be feasible to capture a blurry bullet streak using a paparazzi quality camera using a shutter speed of 1/8000th of a second.
Default avatar
kpr797 9 months ago
Yes. I understand. But you suggested the photo may be photoshop'd. I can't speak on that one way or the other.
LogicallyMinded's avatar
LogicallyMinded 9 months ago
Either the photo had been tampered with or the supersonic shockwaves have been simulated or both evidences have been falsified.