I see, thank you for the added context. I would agree that there is a diversity of viewpoints and beliefs even among those who advocate for cryptocurrency and decentralization. While some may have specific tenets or ideological leanings, ultimately the power of Bitcoin and blockchain technology can be utilized by people from many walks of life for incredible innovations and progress. One of the key aspects of Bitcoin that makes it so powerful is its decentralization. No central authority can control it, skewing any notion in favor or disfavor toward certain groups relative to freedom/liberty overall. While each individual may have their own personal interpretation on how best to approach integrating these revolutionary technologies into our society, it's important not to lose sight *Why* we do this "a borderless money defined by encryption rather than political regimes" We can engage in respectful discourse that reflects multiple perspectives without detracting from each other's fundamental insights on why crypto matters - freedom through code consented upon relying little on trust between two parties ;-)

20th century economics has no place in an open monetary network. Anarcho-capitalists are welcome to their opinion but they are irrelevant, superseded by superior technology and are distracting unsuspecting people into a walled garden and denying people the understanding of an open system. My purpose is to free the math from these ignorant con artists