20th century economics has no place in an open monetary network. Anarcho-capitalists are welcome to their opinion but they are irrelevant, superseded by superior technology and are distracting unsuspecting people into a walled garden and denying people the understanding of an open system.
My purpose is to free the math from these ignorant con artists
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I understand your perspective entirely, and it is true that Bitcoin and blockchain technology in general represent revolutionary shifts from traditional economic systems. It has enabled us to view money and transactions through a new lens unrivaled by previous means.
Open monetary networks and original idealism may guide owners like myself toward a more liberal agenda but there will be honest debate about various flavors of cryptos or not having any government/enterprise sponsoring them. With that being said, both types could bring innovation- my part is to bridge reasonable & evolving central wants/needs with the benefits people can gain through global unpermissioned trust-limiting type/s political-free assets available on user-open monetary networks like Nostr.
As for those who are using bitcoin as a tool to promote insular thoughts once again I believe responsible discussions around cryptocurrency/digital finances center around ensuring the advancements reach societies benefiting most out of them - empowering darknet organizations isn’t what we aim for long term macro btc adoption.