Replies (15)

ภ๏รtг๏ภคยt's avatar ภ๏รtг๏ภคยt
Figures.... *kicks can Nobody wants to talk about the Smith Mundt Modernization Act changes in 2013 or how it was made legal to use propaganda against us citizens shortly after Occupy Wallstreet.... leading to the bullshit we have today....
View quoted note →
None of this would be possible without Trump. Look at everything that happened during Covid. How would the public have reacted if a Democrat was in office and trying to essentially freeze the economy and recommended everyone lockdown? Never would’ve been possible. How would the public have reacted if a Democrat was in office during George Floyd riots? Trump makes all this possible. Without him we would’ve started solving problems ourselves.
So we need to have the government fine the news orgs when they go against the government's definition of "truth?" Sounds like a quick and direct way to legalize the government suppressing freedom of speech. 🤔
CypherKnight777's avatar
CypherKnight777 3 months ago
It's reasonable to demand that opinion be called opinion. Protection for opinion and political speech remain under the First Amendment. Presenting something provably false in the eyes of any reasonableperson as objectively true is a crime against the public. Questioning the credibility of established "facts" is both fine and necessary, but the opinion being presented shouldn't be treated as objective fact for disingenuous reasons. Essentially if this is handled correctly, it would force a bit more intellectual honesty in public discourse through the media. There is of course room for debate as to whether or not government intervention is worthwhile. It certainly might not be. It's difficult to word the intent of such a law to target malicious propaganda without making it theoretically possible to stifle some legitimate discourse as well. On the other hand, anything disclaimed as opinion is probably untouchable anyway, as it should be.
I mean this gives me stuff to look into for sure. But how exactly are you saying that calling this out as a Jewish endeavor is “shifting blame” or “accepting the mark of the beast” specifically?
I think the act allowed the government to push and fund propaganda, which should be illegal. But we've had government funded PBS pretending to be "unbiased" long before Obama.
Nothing will change. The administration is busy kissing the wall and Congress is trying to make boycotting Israel illegal. Meanwhile murderer in NC set free and leftist terrorism can continue because it’s pushed by and controlled by Israel.
Default avatar
umni 3 months ago
Impossible to define truth.