> Reducing the level of consensus required sounds dodgy though Due to extreme mining centralisation you have not one but four pools with more than 10% hashrate share who can single-handedly veto any protocol level change. This was not the case in 2017 and 2021, therefore the bar was considerably higher.

Replies (1)

nix's avatar
nix 1 week ago
With the threshold so close to 50% though there is a risk of a fork and eventual loss of funds for everyone on the losing side of the fork?