The censorship issue is a red herring, basically just sophistry meant to ideologically trigger people of a libertarian mindset into acceptance. It's a variant of the "you're not technical enough to understand" argument, but uses ideological rather than technocratic lingo.
You can call it whatever you want however. Bitcoin is a sound monetary network. If "censorship" means securing bitcoin as sound money and preventing bad actors from destroying it either through greed, stupidity, evil, or a combo of the three, I'm pro censorship all day long.
Anybody arguing against limiting spam should logically be in favour of having frogs and csam permanently printed on their coins and bills as well - limiting that kind of abuse is obviously censorship, right?
Humanity's right to sound money and an end to the fiat standard is more important than some little shitcoiner faggots' right to make extra fiat. They can fake their smut peddling elsewhere, and go fuck themselves in the process.
