Who will print more money: Donald Trump or Kamala Harris?
Login to reply
Replies (35)
Yes.jpg
Both.
But for different reasons. Guess which one will give more of it to Americans.
Kamala Trump
Trampalampa
If your vote mattered, they wouldn't let you cast it. It's all a con
both will print the same amount. this is due to the inherent system.
however, the distribution will be different. hence, the impact on various sectors will be different too.
luckily, on the long run, the effect on bitcoin will also be the same. number go up technology. ;-)
The debt is the debt is the debt. It has to be serviced. The better question is, who will increase GDP more. And that’s a no brainer as we’ve seen both for 4 years/presidency now.
Debt is not an issue if you’re running a budget surplus.
#USA who don’t see they are the same are below 👇
walker be like, “speaking of shitpost sunday…”
===
Jerome Powell
Trump. Kamala will never get close to the printer again
A no-brainer? Trump holds the record for highest budget deficit in US history and never once ran a surplus. Do you think Harris will run a surplus? 🤔
More? Harris.
that’s the neat part: both!
Kamala
Not because Trump is actual some kind of "fiscal conservative", but guys like Elon and RFK will reign in the spending at least slightly
Cleary you can’t read. I said which will raise GDP. And if you understand GDP, it’s a no brainer.
Don't care. TRUMP 2024
The democrats spend more
Trump wants to wasteful bullshit I.E the dept of education
comma la wants to spend more $$$
Both will not print the same amount only a fool would believe that
Trump holds 2nd place for *increasing* the debt to GDP ratio in recent history (25% in a single year 🤯). Only Bush in 2001 did worse.
As long as you increase the debt/GDP ratio you can grow GDP all you like but it won't help
Yes, because of COVID. I figured that was obvious. And thank God he did.
And the bottom statement makes zero sense, you’re just restating yourself a second time in the same sentence. It’s obvious to say that if a percent (x/y) is increasing, the denominator can’t outpace the numerator.
Back to my original statement, it’s a no brainer which will be better for GDP. Energy prices were half the price under Trump administration vs Biden/Harris. If that’s lost on you, I can’t help ya.
We all know fiat falls to its marginal cost of production eventually
same same
Rather, the overlords will come up with more excuses to print and the puppet president will approve it…
yes.
The most honest answer to me is it’ll probably be about the same
Both will print a shitload og money 💸
The facts disagree with your assumptions though. Does this bother you at all?
Under Trump GDP increased from 18.8 to 21.3 trillion USD. Under Biden it increased to an estimated 29 trillion USD in 2024, more than double Trump's growth rate. If you'd walk your talk you'd vote Harris 😂.
For the record: GDP measured in a money you can just print is the dumbest measure in human history.
And finally: Trump already ran massive deficits before COVID because of his trillion dollar tax cuts for the rich. During COVID, he again choose to stimulate demand rather than supply with his stimulus cheques. Both were big contributing factors to later inflation
That’s nominal GDP. Not real GDP. You’re making my point. Everything was “priced” higher in 2024. Clearly you don’t understand.
And you obviously don’t know what the Laffer Curve is if you think Trump’s tax cuts were “for the rich”. There’s no sense in debating a stranger online so poorly read.
But different
You use a lot of words, but never show any data to back it up and try to distract as soon as you're called out.
There's GDP data for 4 years under Trump and 4 years under Biden/Harris. Can you explain how those numbers underpin your statement that it's obvious that Trump will grow GDP more than Harris, either "real" or nominal?
Btw, GDP is still a bullshit measure
#minorityreport