Reading comments on Gloria's departure from people who have never contributed anything is stepping in an enraging sticky fecal mess. The only appropriate response: keep building, keep unashamedly celebrating those who do.

Replies (25)

Bond008's avatar
Bond008 4 months ago
Bitcoin has an immune response via toxic bitcoiners. You should know this by now. It only shows up if you have some testosterone. Go lift and eat some steak. You'll think more clearly afterwards.
Ferris Bueller's avatar
Ferris Bueller 4 months ago
Good thing you dont get to decide who or what a bitcoiner is
See this is the problem, you feel that Bitcoin requires people to contribute? It is already working fine it does not need people to fuck it up (any further than they have) Overinflated egos the lot of these "contributors"
if by working fine you mean overreliant on centralized L2s to scale then I guess it's working fine. I don't see knots ever addressing that situation so you're all set 😁👌
toxic bitcoiners permit an overabundance of centralized and permissioned L2s. they are the reason bitcoin is drowning in centralization right now. they are not an immune system. they are AIDS.
Default avatar
unknown 4 months ago
Bitcoin devs can only be white, Christian, men silly
you don’t need to be an og to get that allowing people to store 100K of arbitrary data on your ssd is like letting strangers dump their trash in your house. one day it blows up
Analogue Dog's avatar
Analogue Dog 4 months ago
Characterising non-contributing users who express earnestly held opinions as enraging will exacerbate the star-chamber conundrum, by polarising and adding distance. Many such users have dedicated a significant part of their lives to the mission of freedom money, even if merely encouraging adoption; and it's not as though their concerns are entirely without merit. The strength of opinion is often because they care so deeply. Thank you for continuing to build - much love x