I can understand people not abandoning traditional social networks where they’ve made big investments of time & energy to build an audience…
BUT I cannot understand refusing to invest ANY time and energy into a protocol that can’t be shut down.
It’s like buying a huge, expensive house, filling it with your favorite things, then putting candles in every room, but refusing to add a smoke detector or buy insurance. You’re just begging to lose everything.
Any investment made into a centralized service, ESPECIALLY one that is known for censoring people and shutting down accounts for no reason, should at MINIMUM require an equal investment into a decentralized alternative.
If everyone who was aware of the problem did this, #Nostr wins.
Login to reply
Replies (10)
I have spent a lot of time trying to mull over why a supposed bitcoiner wouldn't be thrilled by what nostr offers. I only have semi incoherent thoughts on social pressures to fit in with a dominant online culture.
Nostr seems to currently select for those who truly understand the value prop of open protocols and who just don't give a fuck about what other people think.
There’s definitely something to that I suspect. I think way too many people put more value than is really there onto the frivolous “follows” on traditional social. As someone with quite a few followers on X myself, I can feel the urge to want to protect it, but in the end I realize how empty 99% of that is, and that the real network is the group of people I can just contact because I know them, or we’ve done a show together, hung out at conferences, or they listen to my work. With or without X, that’s all still there, X merely becomes a glorified “DM directory” in that context.
Whereas I know others who completely judge themselves by the shallowest metric and want to simply be a part of the group (we all do obviously to varying degrees), and their “embracing the values” is less about about actually living them individually, than it is being in a group that talks about them all the time.
I don’t dislike or despise people who do that, mind you, I just think it’s backwards. For most people though, it’s just a lot easier.
If none of that makes sense, here’s an analogy (someone reminded me of this recently):
You know those people who start a hobby and go out and buy every top-of-the-line piece of equipment for it before they even start?
- Thats the people who want to be in the group on Twitter.
Then there’s the people who just pick up whatever shit they have lying around the house to start their hobby. - That’s the people on #nostr.
In my thinking, at least.
The big influencers actually DO invest in "insurance". They simply have accounts on several social networks.
“Sure I built my house in a really bad hurricane zone, but I’m also building one in a really bad earthquake zone just in case!”


Exactly this is a smart strategy that helps ensure their continued influence and success in the digital age.
Great thread.... I've all but given up in purple pilling people.
I can understand people not abandoning traditional social networks where they’ve made big investments of time & energy to build an audience…
BUT I cannot understand refusing to invest ANY time and energy into a protocol that can’t be shut down.
It’s like buying a huge, expensive house, filling it with your favorite things, then putting candles in every room, but refusing to add a smoke detector or buy insurance. You’re just begging to lose everything.
Any investment made into a centralized service, ESPECIALLY one that is known for censoring people and shutting down accounts for no reason, should at MINIMUM require an equal investment into a decentralized alternative.
If everyone who was aware of the problem did this, #Nostr wins.
View quoted note →
Maybe they have no candles, nothing incendiary to say. They’ve accepted their subservience to the one that feeds them
If they don't have insurance they should be really sure that it is affordable for them...
I couldn't agree more!
🫡