This was the original definition of Bitcoin maximalism, before jerkoffs like Saylor and today’s Core sabotaged Bitcoin’s future. Altcoins were supposed to be demos that, when proven reliable, were to have their features integrated into Bitcoin. Instead Bitcoin’s entire “utility” became a bag to pawn off to retirees, useful idiots, and pension funds.

That's not a chad move, That's getting bitcoin banned in every jurisdiction like monero is. Meanwhile, bitcoin is extremely private if you know how to use it well. (Such as self-custodial lightning or eCash.) No need for monero once those are better implimented.

So you claim Bitcoin is not anti-fragile? You are exposing little by little the larper you are. Early on we always assumed that the Bitcoin idea would end in a huge confrontation with the state. We assumed that Bitcoin needs to make it in the underground first without regulatory approval. Why would the state invite its enemy? But then everything changed. Bitcoin got embraced (kiss of death). While the state moved on to fight Monero.

In other words you fear for the fiat value you put into Bitcoin that now needs regulatory protection else NGL. Thanks for clearing up your stance.