No. The math behind that suggestion ignores 3 things - 1. The compound effect of revenue accumulated by doing good things, if possible 2. The compound effect of revenue generated by doing bad things, if it's not possible to generate it by doing good 3. That everything happening with money is in the movement of it, not a scoreboard of where it sits For context, I suck at math, but I try to look like I understand it to impress Digit, so I thought this through