You know someone is losing an argument when they resort to constant name-calling and labeling without addressing the core issues. >"The state literally doesn’t have the resources to investigate, prosecute and jail even 1% of people who use Bitcoin, even if they wanted to." Ah, so you clearly already understand the concept of making things more difficult to achieve (doesn't require perfection). Take that concept to it's logical conclusion with privacy. You aren't being intellectually honest.