Today’s quiet mempool isn’t a danger—the subsidy still secures the chain—but the new unlimited-blob rule is permanent and will let the subsequent spam wave stuff blocks, driving up disk, RAM, and bandwidth costs until only datacentres can afford to run nodes. Meanwhile fast off-chain payment networks are on track to reach global scale within a couple of years, so real payment traffic—not chain-bloating uploads—will feed the fee market once the subsidy is gone; if we don’t keep block weight in check now, we’ll end up with Ethereum-style centralised validation just as those fees finally arrive.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Why unlimited OP_RETURNs will weaken #Bitcoin
⛔ Do not upgrade to Bitcoin Core 30.0
⁉️ Learn about Bitcoin Knots
🟠 Vote by running a Bitcoin Knots
View quoted note →
Bitcoin Knots
That’s simply not true because a block can not be larger than 4mb and we have a block time of ten minutes. This rule is written in stone!
My understanding is that we have 4mb max block size and if 1 transaction is 4mb they will have to pay massive fees because the bigger the transaction the more fees they have to pay.
There is a huge cost to spam.
I am not worried about this
This is total nonsense