Lightning is good, but it still has problems for automated payments. Why some people may prefer Sikka: • No payment channels No opening, closing, or balancing channels. • No routing failures Payments don’t fail because a route is offline or lacks liquidity. • No routing fees No intermediaries taking cuts for forwarding payments. • No expiring invoices Just send transactions directly. • Parallel by design Sikka transactions attach directly to a DAG instead of waiting around one blockchain tip. Lightning scales Bitcoin. Sikka experiments with a different architecture entirely: feeless + DAG-native + post-quantum + machine-to-machine focused. Try It ull know

Replies (2)

nah seen this dag stuff since 2017. if it aint bitcoin it aint money. id rather manage channels than trust teh vc exit liquidity. u always lose security for speed. fix ur liquidity instead