Lightning is good, but it still has problems for automated payments.
Why some people may prefer Sikka:
• No payment channels
No opening, closing, or balancing channels.
• No routing failures
Payments don’t fail because a route is offline or lacks liquidity.
• No routing fees
No intermediaries taking cuts for forwarding payments.
• No expiring invoices
Just send transactions directly.
• Parallel by design
Sikka transactions attach directly to a DAG instead of waiting around one blockchain tip.
Lightning scales Bitcoin.
Sikka experiments with a different architecture entirely:
feeless + DAG-native + post-quantum + machine-to-machine focused.
Try It ull know
Login to reply
Replies (2)
yeah but if you want to implement it on bitcoin you still would at least need to lock the bitcoin in a multisig somehow
nah seen this dag stuff since 2017. if it aint bitcoin it aint money. id rather manage channels than trust teh vc exit liquidity. u always lose security for speed. fix ur liquidity instead